Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2018 (9) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (9) TMI 1340 - AAAR - GST


Issues involved:
- Whether GST is leviable on the rent payable by a hospital providing lifesaving services.
- Whether input tax credit of GST paid on rent can be availed if the output supply is not taxable.
- Whether there is a provision for refund of input tax credit on rent paid for the premises.
- Whether the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling can pass a ruling on the applicability of Rule 89(h) of the KGST Act.

Analysis:

Issue 1: GST on rent for hospital services
The Appellant, a Cardiology Specialized Hospital, appealed against the ruling that GST is leviable on the rent paid for the premises taken on lease. The Appellant argued that since their healthcare services are exempted from GST, the rent should also be exempt. However, the Authorities upheld the ruling citing specific Notifications levying GST on such rent.

Issue 2: Input tax credit on non-taxable output supply
The Appellant contended that as their output supply is not taxable, they cannot avail input tax credit on the GST paid for rent. They sought a refund of the input tax credit. The Authorities clarified that there is no provision for refund in such cases, as the purpose of paying GST on rent does not serve any specific purpose due to the exempted nature of the output supply.

Issue 3: Provision for refund of input tax credit
The Appellant raised concerns about the lack of provision for refund of input tax credit on rent paid for the premises. They requested the Authorities to pass a ruling on the applicability of Rule 89(h) of the KGST Act to pursue the refund. However, the Authorities dismissed this plea, stating that the issue was not raised before the Advance Ruling Authority and hence cannot be considered in the appeal.

Conclusion:
The Authorities upheld the original ruling that GST is leviable on the rent paid for the hospital premises, despite the healthcare services being exempted from GST. They dismissed the appeal by the Appellant, stating that there is no provision for refund of input tax credit on rent paid for non-taxable output supplies. The plea for a ruling on the applicability of Rule 89(h) of the KGST Act was also rejected as it was not raised before the initial Authority for Advance Ruling.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates