Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2018 (9) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (9) TMI 1342 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the products transported and supplied by the Applicant.
2. Nature of transportation to Raxaul warehouse – whether it is for export to Nepal or a transfer to the Bihar Unit for ultimate export.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Products:
The judgment discusses whether the products transported and supplied by the Applicant are "non-GST products," "non-taxable supplies," "exempt supplies," or "zero-rated supply of goods."

Key Points:
- Petroleum products like HSD, ATF, and Motor Spirit are non-taxable supplies under the GST Act, as GST is not levied on these products until a date notified by the GST Council.
- Non-taxable supplies are included in the turnover of the Applicant, who is a taxable person under the GST Act.

Relevant Sections:
- Section 2(78) of the GST Act defines non-taxable supplies.
- Section 2(47) includes non-taxable supplies under exempt supplies.
- Section 2(112) defines turnover in State, including exempt supplies.

2. Nature of Transportation:
The judgment examines whether the transportation of goods to the Raxaul warehouse is for export to Nepal or a stock transfer to the Bihar Unit.

Key Points:
- The Applicant argues that the transportation is for export to Nepal, claiming it as zero-rated supply under Section 16(1)(a) of the IGST Act.
- The officer concerned argues that it is a stock transfer to the Bihar Unit, making it an exempt supply under Section 17(2) of the GST Act, and thus, input tax credit is not admissible.

Relevant Sections:
- Section 5(1) of the CST Act defines export of goods.
- Section 2(5) of the IGST Act defines export as taking goods out of India.
- Section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act determines the place of supply.

Judgment Analysis:
- The Agreement with Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC) is an umbrella agreement, not a specific export order.
- The Raxaul Depot is a supply point, not merely a transit point, and the goods can be diverted for home consumption.
- The movement from Haldia to Raxaul is not inextricably linked to export to Nepal, breaking the link and making them separate supplies.
- The goods are stored and finally cleared from the export warehouse at Raxaul, making the Bihar Unit responsible for export or duty payment if diverted for home consumption.

Conclusion:
- The goods transported from Haldia Refinery to Raxaul Depot are not zero-rated supplies but exempt supplies from the West Bengal Unit to the Bihar Unit.
- The Applicant cannot claim credit of the GST paid on the railway freight for transportation of these non-taxable supplies.

Ruling:
- ATF and other non-taxable supplies from the Applicant’s Haldia Refinery to the export warehouse at Raxaul are non-taxable supplies.
- The Applicant cannot claim credit of the GST paid on the railway freight for transportation from West Bengal to the Bihar Unit.

This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103(2) until and unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates