9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (9) TMI 1629 - HC - Income TaxReallocating expenditure/income on account of royalty from Jammu Unit to Corporate Division - entitlement to deduction u/s 80-IB - Held that - Tribunal observation that however due to some unforeseen reasons the assessee could not use the technical know-how neither at Jammu Unit nor at any other units. is without considering the findings recorded by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer with reference to the nature of the sachet pouches manufactured at the Jammu Unit had held that the assessee had manufactured and produced the sachet pouches using the technical know-how provided in terms of the MoUs. The Tribunal reversed the said finding without any discussion and explanation to arrive at a completely contrary view accepting the contention of the respondent-assessee. No reason and ground have been recorded why the finding of the Assessing Officer was incorrect or wrong. Thus the matter requires reexamination by the Tribunal on the question whether the Jammu Unit had utilized the technical know-how provided to the respondent-assessee company under the MoUs. Till this core and important aspect and question is decided we cannot proceed and decide the other question whether the expenditure on royalty was incurred by the Jammu Unit or the Corporate Office. - Decided partly in favour of revenue for statistical purposes.
Issues Involved:
1. Reallocation of expenditure/income on account of royalty from Jammu Unit to Corporate Division. 2. Entitlement of the Assessee to deduction under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of sub-licence fee. Detailed Analysis: 1. Reallocation of Expenditure/Income on Account of Royalty: The primary issue was whether the assessee was correct in reallocating the royalty expenditure from the Jammu Unit to the Corporate Division. The respondent-assessee, engaged in manufacturing flexible packaging material, had three units with the Jammu Unit being eligible for tax exemption under Section 80-IB. Initially, for the Assessment Year 2005-06, the royalty paid to Ashok Chaturvedi was treated as an expense of the Jammu Unit, reducing its profit. However, for the Assessment Year 2006-07, the same royalty was treated as an expense of the Corporate Office, thereby increasing the Jammu Unit's profit. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected this reallocation, stating that the royalty expense was directly linked to the Jammu Unit, as the improved sachet pouches manufactured there used the technical know-how provided under the MoUs. The AO noted that the respondent-assessee had manipulated figures to increase the eligible deduction under Section 80-IB by shifting expenses from the Jammu Unit to the Corporate Division. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) affirmed this view but allowed netting of royalty income against the expenditure. The Tribunal, however, accepted the assessee's contention that the technical know-how was not used at the Jammu Unit or any other unit, and thus the royalty expense should be attributed to the Corporate Division. The Tribunal's decision was based on the premise that the technical know-how was sub-licensed to a sister company, earning a sub-licence fee. 2. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80-IB: The second issue was whether the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80-IB for the sub-licence fee. The AO and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the sub-licence fee was not income derived from the industrial undertaking and thus not eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB. The Tribunal, however, found that the sub-licence fee was incidental income and allowed its netting against the royalty expense for computing the deduction. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had not adequately addressed the AO's findings that the sachet pouches manufactured at the Jammu Unit used the technical know-how. The Tribunal's reversal of the AO's findings was done without sufficient discussion or explanation. Consequently, the High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reexamination to determine whether the Jammu Unit utilized the technical know-how. Conclusion: The High Court answered the substantial questions of law partly in favor of the Revenue and against the respondent-assessee. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication on whether the Jammu Unit had utilized the technical know-how, which would impact the determination of the royalty expense allocation and the eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IB. The Tribunal was directed to fix a hearing date on 15.10.2018, with no order as to costs.
|
