9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the transaction evidenced by the release deed amounts to a 'gift' within the meaning of the Gift-tax Act, 1958? Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of a transaction as a 'gift' under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The deceased father bequeathed certain lands to the assessee, who later executed a release deed giving up his life interest in specific properties to his grandson and granddaughters. The Gift Tax Officer (GTO) considered this a transfer of property and levied a tax, which was contested by the assessee. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) canceled the assessment, leading to an appeal by the department to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the release deed effectively conveyed the assessee's life interest in the lands to the respective donees, accelerating their interest as co-owners of the vested remainder. The Tribunal's decision was challenged in the High Court, which analyzed the legal provisions defining 'gift' and 'transfer of property' under the Gift-tax Act. The Court examined the will executed by the deceased father, which specified the distribution of properties among the heirs. The release deed executed by the assessee accelerated the absolute interest of the donees, granting them present ownership rights in the released properties. The Court emphasized that the release deed effectively transferred the life interest of the assessee to the donees, constituting a grant of interest in the property under the Act. Furthermore, the Court distinguished previous cases where the surrender was in favor of all remaindermen, noting that in the present case, the release was partial and specific to certain individuals. Citing relevant legal precedents, the Court concluded that the bilateral nature of the release deed indicated a transfer of interest from the assessee to the donees, qualifying as a gift under the Act. Ultimately, the Court answered the reference question in the affirmative, ruling in favor of the revenue and allowing costs. The judgment clarified that the transaction constituted a gift under the Gift-tax Act, based on the legal provisions and the specific circumstances of the case.
|
