9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Determination of whether interest income of Rs. 63,485 should be assessed as business income or income from other sources for the assessment year 1966-67.
Summary: The case involved a dispute over the categorization of interest income earned by an assessee-company acting as the sole agent for another company. The agreement between the two companies did not explicitly require the assessee to provide loans or keep deposits, but in practice, the assessee did advance funds to the other company. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) treated the interest income as income from other sources, disallowing its set off against business losses. The Appellate Authority Commission (AAC) upheld this decision, emphasizing the absence of any such condition in the agreement. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, considering the advances as part of the assessee's business activities to support the manufacturing company. The Tribunal viewed the advances as commercial in nature, made to facilitate manufacturing activities vital to the assessee's interests. The Tribunal directed that the interest income should be assessed as business income. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's decision, noting that the advances were made for commercial reasons, despite the absence of a contractual obligation. The Court emphasized the close link between the advances and the agreement, leading to the conclusion that the interest income should be treated as business income. Therefore, the interest income of Rs. 63,485 was deemed assessable as business income and not income from other sources. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.
|
