9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Assessability of interest received on tax refunds for the assessment years 1969-70, 1970-71, and 1971-72. Summary: Issue 1: Assessability of Interest for Assessment Year 1969-70 The first issue concerns whether the sum of Rs. 5,557 received as interest on a tax refund for the assessment year 1969-70 is liable to be assessed as income. The assessee paid advance tax during the financial year 1963-64, resulting in a refund of Rs. 22,219, which included interest of Rs. 5,557 u/s 214 of the I.T. Act. The ITO assessed this interest as income under the head "Other sources," a decision confirmed by both the AAC and the Tribunal. Issue 2: Assessability of Interest for Assessment Year 1970-71 The second issue pertains to whether the sum of Rs. 6,197 received as interest on tax refunds for the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67 is liable to be assessed as income for the assessment year 1970-71. The assessee paid advance tax during the financial years 1964-65 and 1965-66, resulting in a refund that included interest of Rs. 3,811 and Rs. 2,386, respectively. The ITO assessed this interest as income under the head "Other sources," a decision upheld by the AAC and the Tribunal. Issue 3: Assessability of Interest for Assessment Year 1971-72 The third issue involves whether the sum of Rs. 10,971 received as interest on a tax refund for the assessment year 1969-70 is liable to be assessed as income for the assessment year 1971-72. The assessee received this interest u/s 214 of the Act, and the ITO assessed it as income under the head "Other sources," a decision confirmed by the AAC and the Tribunal. Court's Analysis and Decision: The court examined the arguments presented by the assessee's counsel, who contended that the interest received was not income but a form of tax refund or remission. The counsel argued that the amounts paid in advance were taxes, not deposits, and any excess payment should be considered a relief in tax, not income. The court disagreed, stating that any excess amount found refundable on assessment could not be treated as tax paid or its refund. The court emphasized that the interest paid u/s 214 of the Act is not a remission or rebate in tax but compensation for the deprivation of the use of money. The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in P. S. Subramanyan, ITO v. Simplex Mills Ltd. [1963] 48 ITR 182 (SC), which held that interest paid on excess advance tax is not a relief in computing income. The court also cited Dr. Shamlal Naruda v. CIT [1964] 53 ITR 151 (SC), which clarified that statutory interest represents profits the creditor might have made if they had the use of the money. The court concluded that the interest received by the assessee is income and not a capital receipt. It held that the interest paid u/s 214 of the Act is assessable under the head "Other sources" as it compensates for the deprivation of the use of money. Conclusion: The court answered all three questions in the affirmative, holding that the interest received during the three assessment years was income liable to be assessed. The Tribunal's decisions were upheld, and the assessee's contentions were rejected. There was no order as to costs.
|
