9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (3) TMI 837 - AAR - GSTConstruction of Indo-Nepal Border Road - Applicability of N/N. 12/2017-Centra1 Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) - Benefit of exemption - whether the notification is applicable to the contractors/ sub- contractors involved in the construction of Indo-Nepal Border Road or otherwise - difference of opinion - Held that - There are different views on the applicability of GST on the sub-contractors - since there are different views on that particular issue we are making a reference to the Appellate Authority for hearing and decision on said issue in terms of Section 98(5) of the Act ibid which provide that where the members of the Authority. differ on any question on which the advance ruling is sought they shall state the point or points on which they differ and make a reference to the Appellate Authority for hearing and decision on such question.
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to contractors/sub-contractors involved in the construction of Indo-Nepal Border Road. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to Contractors/Sub-Contractors: Background and Application: The applicant, M/s NHPC, sought an advance ruling on whether the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 applies to contractors/sub-contractors involved in the construction of the Indo-Nepal Border Road. The application was admitted under Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017. Hearing and Submissions: The applicant's representatives appeared for a personal hearing on 11.01.2019, submitting relevant documents. No representatives from the Revenue side were present. Project Details: The project involves constructing a 1.2 Km long link canal and a 1.3 Km road from Tanakpur Barrage to the Indo-Nepal border, financed by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) under the budget head "Aid to Nepal." NHPC, as a turnkey agency, sub-contracted the road construction to PWD, Uttarakhand, which further sub-contracted it to another contractor. Ruling Analysis: The primary issue is whether the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 extends to sub-contractors. View 1 (Vipin Chandra, Member): - The work of "construction of road" by the applicant (NHPC) is exempt from GST as per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). - However, there is no specific exemption for sub-contractors under the same notification. - Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribes a GST rate of 12% for "construction of road" services provided by sub-contractors. - Therefore, sub-contractors are liable to pay GST at 12%. View 2 (Amit Gupta, Member): - The MEA allotted the work to NHPC, which sub-let it to PWD, Uttarakhand, which further sub-let it to a contractor. - The exemption for NHPC under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) should logically extend to sub-contractors to avoid defeating the purpose of the exemption. - The GST Council recommended reducing GST rates for sub-contractors to align with the main contractor's rate. - Applying a purposive interpretation, if the main contractor (NHPC) is exempt from GST, sub-contractors should also be exempt to maintain the benefit throughout the supply chain. - Citing case laws, the interpretation should aim to give effect to the legislative intent and avoid absurd results. Conclusion and Reference to Appellate Authority: Due to differing views on the applicability of GST to sub-contractors, the matter is referred to the Appellate Authority for a final decision, as provided under Section 98(5) of the Act. This section mandates that if members of the Authority differ on any question, they shall state the points of difference and refer the matter to the Appellate Authority for a decision.
|
