1978 (8) TMI 62 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Claim of deduction under section 80J of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1972-73.
2. Allowance of carry forward deficiencies against income in the fourth year.
3. Interpretation of provisions of sections 80A, 80J(1), (2), section 2(45), section 5, and section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
4. Legality of the Tribunal's decision in allowing the assessee's claim under section 80J(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:

The High Court of Allahabad considered a case where the assessee, a registered firm operating a cold storage business, claimed a deduction of Rs.2,30,754 under section 80J of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1972-73. The deduction included a deficiency from previous years and a current year claim. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the claim for past years but allowed a partial deduction for the current year. The Tribunal, however, allowed the carry forward of deficiencies against income in the fourth year, leading to a dispute.

The Tribunal referred two questions of law to the High Court for consideration. The first question pertained to the failure of the assessee to claim relief under section 80J in previous assessment years and whether it impacted the claim for the assessment year 1972-73. The second question questioned the legality of the Tribunal's decision in allowing the assessee's claim under section 80J(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The court analyzed section 80J, which provides deductions for profits and gains from newly established industrial undertakings. Sub-section (3) allows for the carry forward of claimed deductions against profits and gains of subsequent years in cases of deficiency. The legislative intent behind section 80J was to incentivize the establishment of specific industries by providing relief for a specified period against profits and gains.

The court emphasized that there is no explicit requirement in section 80J for the assessee to make a specific claim if losses have been incurred, and no profits or gains are available for adjustment. It distinguished previous cases where claims were necessary due to profits being earned. The court held that the Tribunal was justified in allowing the claim for carry forward deficiencies against income in the fourth year.

In conclusion, the High Court answered both questions in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision to allow the claim under section 80J(3). The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.