9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Interpretation of exemption provision under s. 5(a) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957 regarding expenditure on maintenance and running of race horses for earning income.
The judgment delivered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court involved a reference under s. 25(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957, concerning an assessee who claimed exemption under s. 5(a) for expenditure incurred on maintenance of race horses and racing. The Expenditure-tax Officer initially determined the taxable expenditure at a higher amount, including the expenditure on race horses. The assessee's appeal to the AAC and then to the Tribunal were both rejected, leading to the reference to the High Court. The Tribunal, relying on previous tax cases, did not consider the specific language of s. 5(a) which includes "for the purpose of earning income from any other source." The High Court highlighted that the assessee's case consistently maintained that the expenditure was incurred for earning income from horse races, falling within the scope of s. 5(a). The court differentiated previous cases under the Indian I.T. Act, emphasizing that the language of s. 5(a) specifically includes expenditure for earning income from any other source, which was the primary purpose of the assessee's expenditure on race horses. The High Court scrutinized previous judgments cited by the Tribunal, clarifying that they were not directly applicable to the current case under the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The court emphasized that the assessee's expenditure on maintaining and running race horses for the purpose of earning income aligned with the provisions of s. 5(a), which exempts expenditure incurred for earning income from any other source. The court distinguished cases where deductions were claimed under different sections of the Indian I.T. Act, emphasizing that s. 5(a) specifically caters to expenditure for earning income from any other source, which was the crux of the assessee's claim regarding the race horses. Furthermore, the court highlighted a circular issued by the Board supporting the exemption of expenditure on training horses and making them fit for races under s. 5(a), which the Tribunal failed to consider. The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in not granting the exemption claimed by the assessee under s. 5(a) and ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specific language and provisions of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957.
|
