9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 1567 - HC - GSTDetention and seizure of the transport vehicle - recovery of tax and penalty - Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - HELD THAT - Having argued the matter for some time resisting the writ petition, both the sides now are in broad agreement that the vehicle in question can be retained by the petitioner by furnishing a Bank Guarantee for the value of the goods in question on or before 10th April 2019, failing which the official respondents are at liberty to seize and detain the vehicle with the police force and of RTO, if so required. Petition disposed off.
Issues:
Challenge to order under Section 129 of Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for detention and seizure of transport vehicle. Analysis: The judgment concerns the challenge to an order dated 11.03.2019 under Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. This section allows for the detention and seizure of a transport vehicle used for goods transportation in certain circumstances. The respondents, represented by the Additional Government Advocate and a Commercial Tax Officer, argue that the order is justified as per the provisions of Section 129. The section outlines the process for detention, seizure, and release of goods and conveyances in transit when goods are transported or stored in contravention of the Act or rules. It specifies conditions for release, including payment of applicable tax and penalty, furnishing security, and issuance of notices by the proper officer. Importantly, it mandates providing an opportunity to the concerned person to be heard before determining tax, interest, or penalty. The court notes that despite initial resistance, both parties now agree that the petitioner can retain the vehicle by providing a Bank Guarantee for the value of the goods in question by a specified date. Failure to comply would authorize the official respondents to seize and detain the vehicle with the assistance of the police force and RTO if necessary. With this agreement recorded, the court disposes of the writ petition based on the understanding reached between the parties.
|
