Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (6) TMI 1011 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the procedure to raise the invoice from Mumbai Office for imports received at Paradip Port, Odisha, without separate GST Registration in Odisha, and charge IGST from Mumbai to customers is correct.
2. If separate registration in Odisha is not required, whether it is correct to mention the GSTIN of Mumbai and the dispatch place as Paradip Port in the e-way bill.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Invoice Procedure and GST Registration Requirement

The applicant, M/s. Aarel Import Export Private Limited, operates from Mumbai, Maharashtra, and is registered under the GST Act in Maharashtra. They import goods at Paradip Port, Odisha, and store them in a rented customs warehouse without having any separate establishment in Odisha. The applicant seeks to clear the goods from the warehouse using their Maharashtra GSTIN and sell directly to customers in Odisha, charging IGST from Mumbai.

Legal Provisions and Interpretation:
- As per Section 7(2) of the IGST Act, 2017, the supply of goods imported into India is treated as inter-state trade or commerce.
- Section 11(a) of the IGST Act, 2017, specifies that the place of supply for imported goods is the location of the importer, which in this case is Mumbai, Maharashtra.
- Section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, mandates registration in the state from where taxable supplies are made if aggregate turnover exceeds twenty lakh rupees.

Authority's Observations:
The place of supply is identified as the location of the importer, i.e., Mumbai. Since the applicant does not have any establishment in Odisha, the taxable supply is deemed to be made from Mumbai. Consequently, the applicant can clear goods using the Mumbai GSTIN without requiring separate registration in Odisha. This conclusion aligns with the precedent set in the case of Sonkamal Enterprises Private Limited, where similar facts led to a ruling that no separate registration was needed in the state where the port of import is located.

Conclusion:
The procedure to raise invoices from the Mumbai office for imports received at Paradip Port, Odisha, and charge IGST from Mumbai to customers is correct. Separate GST registration in Odisha is not required.

Issue 2: E-way Bill and GSTIN Mention

The applicant inquires whether, without separate registration in Odisha, they can conduct transactions using the Mumbai GSTIN and if it is correct to mention the GSTIN of Mumbai and the dispatch place as Paradip Port in the e-way bill.

Legal Provisions and Interpretation:
- The place of supply for imported goods is the location of the importer, which is Mumbai.
- The goods are cleared in the name of the Mumbai registered address, and IGST is paid at the time of customs clearance.

Authority's Observations:
Since the place of supply is Mumbai and the goods are cleared using the Mumbai GSTIN, the applicant can conduct further transactions using the Mumbai GSTIN. It is permissible to mention the GSTIN of the Mumbai office in the e-way bill and the dispatch place as the customs warehouse at Paradip Port, Odisha.

Conclusion:
The applicant can conduct transactions using the Mumbai GSTIN and correctly mention the GSTIN of Mumbai and the dispatch place as Paradip Port in the e-way bill.

Order:
1. The procedure to raise invoices from the Mumbai office for imports received at Paradip Port, Odisha, and charge IGST from Mumbai to customers is correct. No separate GST registration in Odisha is required.
2. It is correct to mention the GSTIN of Mumbai and the dispatch place as Paradip Port in the e-way bill.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates