Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1976 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1976 (12) TMI 36 - HC - Income Tax

Issues: Determination of profit rate for a liquor contractor based on turnover estimation.

Summary:
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed the issue of determining the profit rate for a liquor contractor for the assessment year 1966-67. The Income-tax Officer rejected the books produced by the assessee and estimated the sales at Rs. 11,50,000, with a profit rate of 7 1/2 per cent. The appeals to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were unsuccessful. The Tribunal referred the question of justifiably applying the 7 1/2 per cent. profit rate on the turnover of the petitioner to the High Court.

The petitioner's counsel argued that considering the case of a different assessee for an earlier year was not justified, especially due to the impact of the Indo-Pakistan war in 1965 on the petitioner's sales. However, the High Court found the revenue was justified in considering the case of another liquor contractor from the same area for an earlier year as the best available material. The petitioner's sales were not significantly affected by the war, as evidenced by the sales figures. The Court noted that the petitioner's sales peaked in December 1965, and the sales amount was not impacted by the war. Therefore, the Court answered the question in the affirmative, upholding the application of the 7 1/2 per cent. profit rate on the petitioner's turnover.

This judgment highlights the importance of considering relevant comparable cases in determining profit rates for assessments, even in the presence of external factors like war, and emphasizes the need for proper grounds to challenge such considerations before the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates