Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1976 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1976 (5) TMI 6 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved: Interpretation of penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for delay in filing return u/s 139(4).

Summary:
The High Court of Allahabad considered a case where penalty proceedings were initiated against a firm for delay in filing its income tax return. The firm, consisting of four partners, filed its return after a delay of 17 months, leading to the imposition of a penalty by the Income-tax Officer. The firm appealed the decision, providing explanations for the delay, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did not accept them. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, however, allowed the appeal based on a previous Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal's decision was challenged, and the question before the court was whether the penalty imposed was justified.

The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly section 139, which outlines the procedure for filing income tax returns. Section 139(4) allows an assessee to file a return before the assessment is made or within a specified period. The court emphasized that the penalty provisions serve to safeguard revenue and deter evasive behavior by assessees. The court noted that the penalty under section 271(1)(a) applies when an assessee fails to furnish a return within the specified time and in the required manner.

The court rejected the argument that filing a return under section 139(4) absolves an assessee from penalty under section 271(1)(a). It held that once an assessee is in default, the penalty provision applies, irrespective of the section under which the return was filed. The court cited precedents from the Andhra Pradesh High Court and Patna High Court to support its interpretation. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the revenue department, upholding the penalty imposed on the firm for the delay in filing the return. The court awarded costs to the revenue department.

This judgment clarifies that the penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act can be imposed for delays in filing returns, regardless of the specific section under which the return is filed, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with tax regulations to avoid penalties and uphold revenue interests.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates