9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are related to penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning the concealment of income by the assessee and the justification of the penalty imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. Judgment Details: Issue 1: Concealment of Income The Income-tax Officer estimated the income of the assessee at Rs. 1,03,404 as the account books were not accepted. However, the Tribunal found that the additions were made on an estimate basis due to improper maintenance of account books, not deliberate concealment. The Tribunal concluded that the charge of concealment could not be sustained in such cases. Issue 2: Justification of Penalty The Tribunal observed that penalty proceedings are penal in nature, and the burden lies on the department to prove deliberate concealment of income. In this case, the Tribunal found that the additions to the assessable income were based on estimates due to improper accounts, not deliberate concealment. The Tribunal held that the difference between the assessed and returned income was not due to gross or wilful neglect by the assessee. Minor omissions in income reporting were attributed to oversight, not wilful neglect, causing no prejudice to the revenue. Conclusion: The High Court upheld the Tribunal's findings, stating that there was sufficient material to justify that the assessee was not guilty of gross or wilful neglect as per the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the penalty imposed. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.
|
