Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (10) TMI 756 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Qualification of Project Management services as activities related to Panchayat or Municipality under the Constitution of India.
2. Classification of supervision fees as "Pure services" for exemption under relevant notifications.
3. Determination of whether the applicant falls under the definition of governmental authority or Government entity.

Issue 1:
The case involved an application under section 97 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, seeking an advance ruling on whether Project Management services provided by the applicant to a recipient would qualify as activities related to functions entrusted to Panchayat or Municipality under the Constitution of India. The applicant, a corporation in Goa, was responsible for various aspects of sewerage projects, including project planning, construction supervision, and detailed design. The ruling determined that the services provided fell under the 12th Schedule of Article 243W of the Indian Constitution, specifically under public health, sanitation, conservancy, and solid waste management, thus meeting the admissibility criteria.

Issue 2:
The second issue addressed in the judgment was the classification of supervision fees received by the applicant. The question was whether these fees qualified as "Pure services" under relevant notifications for exemption from CGST and SGST. The ruling concluded that supervision fees received for services provided to a Governmental Authority in relation to functions entrusted to a Panchayat or Municipality were considered "Pure services" and exempted from CGST and SGST under specific notifications.

Issue 3:
Lastly, the judgment analyzed whether the applicant fell under the definition of a governmental authority or Government entity as per the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The definition of "governmental authority" was scrutinized, and it was established that the applicant met the criteria outlined in the Act and subsequent amendments, thereby confirming the applicant's classification as a Governmental Authority or Government Entity.

In conclusion, the ruling provided clarity on the qualification of Project Management services, the classification of supervision fees, and the applicant's status as a governmental authority or Government entity under the relevant tax laws and constitutional provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates