9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to set-off the share in the loss claimed for specific assessment years against its business profits. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an assessment dispute involving a partnership firm and another firm jointly negotiating contracts for the supply of salt. The Income-tax Officer treated them as an unregistered firm of partnership and included the profits in the total income. The contention that it was a joint venture was rejected. In subsequent years, the firms faced losses and profits in the contracts. The dispute arose regarding the set-off of losses against business profits. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the set-off, considering the firms as an association of persons. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing that there was no prohibition on setting off losses in an association of persons. The revenue contended that losses of an association should be carried forward, not set off individually. The court held that unless there is a specific prohibition, the set-off claimed could not be refused. The court also clarified that section 70 allows set-off of losses from different sources under the same head of income, irrespective of the unit that suffered the loss. The court referred to previous cases and principles under the Income-tax Act to support its decision. It highlighted that the charge of tax is on total income, allowing losses from any source in a year to be set off against income from other sources. The judgment emphasized that income tax is a single tax, and there is no prohibition preventing a member of an association of persons from setting off their share of loss against other incomes. The court concluded that the assessee was entitled to set off the losses claimed for specific assessment years against its income, ruling in favor of the assessee. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of relevant sections of the Income-tax Act and precedent cases to support its decision.
|
