1975 (9) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
2. Computation of capital employed for deduction u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. Validity of Rule 19A in light of legislative intent and historical context.

Summary:

1. Applicability of Rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962:
The primary issue is whether Rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, which provides for the computation of capital employed in an industrial undertaking or a hotel business for the purpose of section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, restricts the scope of reliefs u/s 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 18th February 1972, arguing that the computation should consider the average amounts of increases and/or decreases in the assets and liabilities during the previous year, not just the value as on the first day of the previous year.

2. Computation of Capital Employed for Deduction u/s 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The petitioner, Century Enka Ltd., claimed a deduction of Rs. 40,57,324 based on their calculation of capital employed during the previous year, which was Rs. 6,76,22,072. The Income-tax Officer, however, computed the capital employed as on the first day of October 1969, at Rs. 5,26,59,600 and allowed a deduction of Rs. 31,60,555. The petitioner argued that the computation should be based on the average capital employed during the entire previous year, not just on the first day.

3. Validity of Rule 19A in Light of Legislative Intent and Historical Context:
The court examined the legislative history of section 80J and its predecessors, section 15C of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was noted that the purpose of these sections was to grant tax relief on the capital employed in new industrial undertakings. The court found that Rule 19A, by restricting the computation to the value of assets on the first day of the computation period, was contrary to the legislative intent of encouraging the deployment of capital throughout the previous year. The court held that Rule 19A, to the extent it restricts the computation to the first day of the computation period, is ultra vires section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Judgment:
The assessment order was set aside to the extent it refused deduction based on the average capital employed during the previous year. The Income-tax Officer was directed to reassess in light of the court's observations. The rule was made absolute, with no order for costs, and interim orders were vacated. The operation of the order was stayed for two weeks after the long vacation.