9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Whether the appellant is entitled to carry forward the loss from previous years and set it off against the business income for a subsequent year. Analysis: The case involved a limited company with branch offices carrying on business in hill produce. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was asked to determine if the company could carry forward losses from 1963-64 and 1964-65 to set off against the profit for 1968-69. The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax contended that the business had been discontinued prior to the relevant previous year, leading to a revision of the assessment order to disallow the set off. The Tribunal upheld this decision, prompting a legal challenge by the assessee. The crux of the matter revolved around the interpretation of section 72 of the Income-tax Act, which allows for the carry forward of losses under certain conditions. The Tribunal found that the business had been closed down during the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68, supported by the assessee's admission in a previous proceeding. The Tribunal concluded that the business was not merely dormant but discontinued before the relevant previous year, rendering the assessee ineligible to carry forward the losses. The assessee's counsel argued that the Tribunal's finding of discontinuance was an inference of law that could be challenged. However, the Tribunal's factual findings were deemed conclusive unless proven to be without evidence or perverse. Since the assessee did not raise a specific question challenging the Tribunal's findings, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the department and against the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of challenging factual findings with evidence and specific questions to contest the Tribunal's conclusions. In conclusion, the court upheld the decision disallowing the carry forward and set off of losses, directing the parties to bear their respective costs. The judgment highlights the significance of presenting evidence and raising specific challenges to factual findings in tax cases to contest the conclusions of the Tribunal effectively.
|
