9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the transfer of lands by the assessee to his daughter constitutes a "taxable gift" under the Gift-tax Act. 2. The valuation of the lands transferred. Summary: Issue 1: Taxable Gift under the Gift-tax Act The primary question referred to the High Court was whether the transfer of lands by the assessee to his only daughter fell within the meaning of "taxable gift" u/s 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act. The assessee contended that the transfer was not a gift as it was made in consideration of his daughter's marriage, fulfilling his legal obligation under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, and general Hindu law. The Gift-tax Officer rejected this contention, assessing the transfer as a gift and determining the taxable gift at Rs. 43,000 after exemptions u/s 5(1)(vii) and u/s 5(2). The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the Gift-tax Officer's assessment, stating that the law does not obligate a father to make a gift of property for his daughter's marriage. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that the transfer was made in discharge of the father's obligation to provide for his daughter's marriage, thus not constituting a "taxable gift." The High Court examined the definition of "gift" u/s 2(xii) and the obligations under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act. It noted that the transfer must be voluntary and without consideration to be a gift. The court referred to various legal commentaries and judicial dictionaries to interpret the term "incident to marriage." It concluded that if the conveyance of land is a usual practice in the community for marriage purposes, it could be considered incidental to marriage and thus not a gift. Issue 2: Valuation of the Lands The valuation of the lands was disputed by the assessee at various stages. However, the Appellate Tribunal did not delve into this issue, as it found the transfer non-taxable. The High Court did not address the valuation issue directly, focusing instead on the nature of the transfer. Conclusion: The High Court declined to answer the referred question, noting that the Tribunal failed to consider whether the conveyance was a usual practice in the community. It left the Tribunal to determine this aspect and adjust its decision accordingly u/s 26(6) of the Gift-tax Act. The court emphasized that the Tribunal should examine if the transfer was a reasonable provision for the daughter's marriage, customary in the family or community. There was no order as to costs.
|
