Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2020 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (3) TMI 992 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
- Quashing of order dated 20.01.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge
- Interpretation of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
- Applicability of Section 148 in appeals filed before and after the amendment
- Extension of time for depositing compensation amount

Analysis:
1. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 20.01.2020 by the Additional Sessions Judge, directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within 60 days for entertaining the appeal against a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner argued that the amendment incorporating Section 148 was not applicable at the time of filing the appeal.

2. The court noted that the amendment to Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was made effective from 01.09.2018. Referring to a previous Supreme Court judgment, it was held that Section 148 should be applied retrospectively to appeals filed against convictions under Section 138, even if the complaints were lodged before the amendment. Therefore, the order directing the deposit did not suffer from any illegality.

3. The petitioner, citing financial difficulties, requested an extension of time for depositing the amount. The court acknowledged the petitioner's situation and extended the period for deposit by 30 days, not exceeding a total of 90 days from the date of the original order. This decision aimed to ensure justice without causing prejudice to the respondent.

4. The court emphasized that the purposive interpretation of Section 148 was essential to prevent delay tactics in cases of dishonored cheques, as highlighted by the Parliament's amendment to the Act. By allowing the extension, the court balanced the interests of both parties while upholding the legislative intent behind the amendment.

5. In conclusion, the court disposed of the petition by directing the Additional Sessions Judge to grant an additional 30 days for the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount, setting the new deadline at 19.04.2020. This decision aligned with the principles of fairness and practicality in the context of the petitioner's financial constraints.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates