9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act of 1961 for direction to the Appellate Tribunal to state a case and refer a question regarding the inclusion of income from undisclosed sources.
Analysis: The case involved an individual assessee for the assessment year 1964-65. The Income-tax Officer discovered cash credits of Rs. 12,000, with Rs. 4,000 in the name of the assessee's minor son and Rs. 8,000 in the assessee's name. The explanation provided was that the Rs. 4,000 was a gift from the grandson and the Rs. 8,000 was from the sale of a truck owned by the assessee. However, both amounts were added as income from other sources by the Income-tax Officer, a decision upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Upon further appeal, the Tribunal considered the explanations. Regarding the Rs. 4,000 in the minor son's name, it was noted that there was no evidence of investment by the assessee, and the source was accepted due to the grandfather's opulent circumstances. As for the Rs. 8,000 from the truck sale, the Tribunal accepted the explanation after verifying the ownership of the truck through a certified copy of registration. The Tribunal concluded that the Rs. 8,000 was explained and deleted the addition. The Tribunal's decision was based on factual findings, with no legal question arising. The Court rejected the revenue's application, emphasizing that the matter was concluded by factual determinations. The judges concurred with the decision, leading to the rejection of the application without costs. This judgment highlights the importance of substantiating explanations for cash credits and income sources during income tax assessments. It underscores the significance of providing documentary evidence to support claims and the Tribunal's authority to make factual determinations in tax matters.
|
