Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2020 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (4) TMI 84 - HC - CustomsAdvance authorization - extension of time for fulfilment of export obligation - It is the case of the petitioners that they have fulfilled the export obligations for both the authorizations in terms of quantity as well as in terms of F.O.B. value. However, the petitioners have taken a little more time over and above six months allowed by this court for fulfillment of export obligations for one of the authorizations. HELD THAT - It is evident that the petitioners have fulfilled the export obligation under the advance authorisations; however, in case of Authorisation No.0810090670 there has been a delay of two months and one day in fulfilling the export obligation. From the averments made in the memorandum of application as referred to hereinabove, this court is of the considered view that sufficient cause has been shown by the petitioners for not fulfilling the export obligation within the time specified by this court. There is an enabling provision which permits the regional authority to extend the export obligation period in the two contingencies as provided under clause (b) and clause (c) of para 4.42 of the Handbook of Procedures; however, in the facts of the present case in view of the fact that the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade has allowed substitution of name of the new entity and its IEC number with extension of export obligation period by six months under the directions of this court, it is not possible for him to extend such period on his own at the request of the petitioners. It is in these circumstances, that though the power of extension is vested in the regional authority, he may not be in a position to exercise such power unless permitted by this court. Therefore, it would be necessary for this court to issue appropriate directions to the concerned authority. The second respondent Joint Director General of Foreign Trade is directed to allow extension of appropriate period under paragraph 4.42 of the Handbook of Procedures upon charging of composition fee as applicable either under clause (b) or clause (c), as the case may be, and intimate the petitioners about the amount payable by them. Upon such intimation being received, the petitioners shall deposit such amount of composition fee within ten days of receipt of such communication - Application allowed.
Issues:
Extension of export obligation period for Advance Authorizations. Detailed Analysis: The petitioners sought an extension of two months and one day for Advance Authorization No.0810090670 dated 21.7.2010 to fulfill export obligations. They also requested regularization of fulfillment of export obligations. The petitioners approached the court due to the delay in substituting their name and Import-Export Code number in two Advance Authorizations. The court had earlier directed the substitution and extension of export obligation period. The petitioners fulfilled the export obligations but required more time for one authorization due to weather conditions affecting exports of power-driven pumps. The petitioners argued that they faced delays due to unforeseen circumstances and sought an extension based on Handbook of Procedures provisions. The respondent contended that extensions beyond a specified period require committee approval. The court considered the reasons for delay and the Handbook's provisions. It noted that the petitioners fulfilled obligations but had a slight delay for one authorization. The court referred to Handbook provisions allowing extensions subject to conditions. The Handbook of Procedures allows the regional authority to extend export obligation periods under specific conditions. However, due to court directions, the authority could not independently extend the period. The court directed the authority to extend the period under the Handbook's provisions upon charging the composition fee. The court did not delve into the argument on which clause applied, leaving it to the authority to decide. The court allowed the application, directing the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to extend the period under the Handbook's provisions. The petitioners were instructed to pay the applicable composition fee within ten days. The exports made within the specified period were to be regularized. The rule was made absolute with no costs imposed.
|