9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses the issue of whether the assessee, a trust created for charitable purposes, qualifies for exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on the interpretation of its trust deed and activities. Details of the Judgment: The trust in question was constituted by Sri Alur Laxminarayana Rao through a deed dated 17th March, 1958, settling a sum of Rs. 5,000 for various charitable objects outlined in the deed. The objects of the trust, as per Clause 4 of the deed, include providing benefits irrespective of caste, awarding scholarships, medical relief, managing endowments for educational purposes, establishing and running various institutions for public welfare, and contributing to charitable, religious, educational, and cultural activities. Additionally, the trust is empowered under Clause 8 of the deed to engage in trades or business activities to augment the trust fund. The Income-tax Officer for the assessment year 1969-70 initially denied the trust exemption under section 11 of the Act, contending that it was not a genuine charitable trust. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and subsequently the Tribunal held that the trust qualified as a charitable trust u/s 2(15) of the Act and was entitled to the exemption. The Tribunal noted that substantial funds had been applied for charitable purposes, particularly for the relief of the poor, education, and medical relief, which were deemed as the dominant objects of the trust. The department argued that the trust's engagement in business activities, as enabled by Clause 8 of the deed, disqualified it from being considered charitable and thus ineligible for exemption. However, the Tribunal rejected this argument, citing legal precedent that business activities do not disqualify a trust primarily focused on relief of the poor, education, and medical relief from claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the trust was indeed entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the trust's main objectives aligned with charitable purposes, and its engagement in business activities did not negate its eligibility for exemption. Therefore, the court answered the referred question in the affirmative, ruling in favor of the assessee and awarding costs for the reference.
|
