9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Determining the correct assessment year for gifts made on 2nd February 1963 under the Gift-tax Act. Analysis: The case involved a dispute over the assessment year for gifts made by the assessee on 2nd February 1963. The assessee initially filed a voluntary return for these gifts under the Gift-tax Act, showing the assessment year as 1964-65 and the previous year as S.Y. 2019. The Gift-tax Officer assessed the gifts based on this return. The assessee contended that the assessment year should be 1963-64, not 1964-65, but both the Gift-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner ruled against this contention. The Appellate Tribunal considered the provisions of section 2, clause (xx) of the Gift-tax Act to determine the previous year for the gifts. Sub-clauses (a) and (b) of clause (xx) were ruled out as they did not apply to the case. The Tribunal focused on sub-clause (c), the residuary clause, which defines the previous year as per section 3 of the Income-tax Act if an assessment were to be made under that Act for that year. The Tribunal interpreted sub-clause (c) to mean that the previous year for gift-tax should be the financial year, not the Samvat year used for income-tax assessment. However, the High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's interpretation. The Court clarified that sub-clause (c) did not introduce a legal fiction but incorporated the definition of "previous year" from the Income-tax Act for specific circumstances. The Court emphasized that gifts are not considered income in the hands of the donor and should not be treated as such. The Court held that the previous year for the gifts should be the S.Y. 2019, as it corresponded to the assessment year 1964-65 when the gifts were made on 2nd February 1963. Ultimately, the High Court answered the question in the negative, ruling against the assessee. The Court determined that the previous year for the gifts in question should be S.Y. 2019, and the assessment year should be 1964-65. The respondent-assessee was directed to bear the costs of the Commissioner in the reference. This judgment clarifies the interpretation of the previous year under the Gift-tax Act and emphasizes the distinction between gifts and income for assessment purposes. The Court's analysis provides guidance on applying the relevant provisions of the Gift-tax Act to determine the correct assessment year for gifts made by an assessee.
|
