9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act based on the deceased's life interest in a house property. Analysis: The judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dealt with a reference under the Estate Duty Act regarding the exemption claimed by the accountable person in relation to a house property in Parvathipuram. The deceased had executed a settlement deed retaining a life interest in the house and conveying the remainder to his son. The main issue revolved around whether the deceased's life interest in the house qualified for exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Act. The Assistant Controller and Appellate Controller contended that since the deceased did not die as the full owner of the house, it did not "belong" to him, thus not meeting the exemption criteria. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held that the property must be deemed to pass on the death of the deceased, satisfying the exemption conditions. The Tribunal interpreted the words "belonging to him" broadly to include even a life-tenancy interest. The High Court analyzed the language of section 33(1)(n) and the definition of "property" under the Act, which includes any interest in property, movable or immovable. By considering the deceased's life interest in the house as an interest within the definition of property, the Court concluded that the exemption under section 33(1) applied to any interest in the property belonging to the deceased and passing on his death. Referring to a Supreme Court decision emphasizing the broad interpretation of the term "belonging to," the High Court held that the deceased's life-tenancy interest in the house fell within the scope of the exemption provision. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the accountable person, stating that the house property, in which the deceased had a life-tenancy, was entitled to exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The accountable person was awarded costs for the reference.
|
