Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2021 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (4) TMI 215 - AT - Customs


Issues:
1. Denial of clearance for imported goods due to lack of required licenses.
2. Imposition of personal penalty under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962.
3. Appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order for release of goods under bond.
4. Consideration of goods imported for public health purposes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
5. Evaluation of the decision to release goods for immediate use without prolonged delay.

Analysis:
1. The case involved the denial of clearance for imported Thermo Drones and Thermal batteries by M/s.Kamdar Global Solutions Pvt.Ltd. based on the requirement of licenses as per DGFT Notification No.30/2015-2020 and WPC license for the drones. The original authority imposed a personal penalty under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner (Appeals) later ordered for the release of goods under bond, subject to producing necessary licenses within six months. The Revenue appealed against this order to the Tribunal.

2. The department argued that the goods should not have been released without the required licenses as per the notification. However, the Tribunal noted that the imported goods were specifically intended for use during the COVID-19 pandemic for monitoring public activities. The drones were meant for the police department to enforce lockdown restrictions. The department had issued an end-user certificate confirming the intended use for COVID-19 monitoring. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of viewing the situation in the context of a global pandemic and acknowledged the immediate need for such equipment.

3. The Tribunal highlighted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had correctly assessed the situation and ordered the release of goods for immediate use to help contain the spread of COVID-19 and save lives. The Tribunal emphasized that adjudication requires a thoughtful consideration of the circumstances of each case, and in this instance, releasing the goods promptly was crucial. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal, affirming the decision to release the goods without delay.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order to release the imported goods for immediate use during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the critical public health importance and the necessity to act promptly in such circumstances.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates