9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1976 (7) TMI 66 - HC - Central ExciseValuation - Exclusion of freight and marketing expenses - Cost of packing for vegetable products
Issues:
Refund of excise duty paid including freight, marketing expenses, and packing expenditure for the period 1-3-69 to 28-2-70. Analysis: The petitioners, a public limited company, sought to quash orders refusing refund of excise duty paid for the period 1-3-69 to 28-2-70. The product in question was Vanaspati, a vegetable product subject to excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners claimed refund on grounds of freight, marketing, and packing costs. The respondents initially refused the refund, leading to the filing of the present petition on 5-4-1970. The court noted that the price for levy of duty must exclude post-manufacturing costs and expenses, as established in previous judgments. The real value of the excisable product should only include manufacturing cost and profit, excluding selling costs and profits. The court agreed with previous decisions that packing costs cannot be included in the value of the excisable product. The court directed the respondents to work out the price of the goods in line with Supreme Court principles and file specific affidavits. The petitioners provided a statement showing the excess duty recovered due to inclusion of freight, marketing expenses, and packing expenditure. The respondents acknowledged the correctness of the calculations and agreed that if these costs were not part of the product value, the petitioners would be entitled to a refund. The court ordered the respondents to refund the excess duty amounting to Rs. 19,32,504.44 within two months and prohibited future recovery of duty including these items in the excisable value of the product unless permitted by law. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of the petitioners, granting the refund of excise duty paid for the specified period and prohibiting inclusion of freight, marketing expenses, and packing costs in the excisable value of the product. The rule was made absolute with no orders as to costs.
|
