Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2021 (10) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (10) TMI 146 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether GST is payable on goods procured from a vendor located outside India when the goods are not brought into India.
2. Whether GST is payable on goods sold to a customer located outside India, where goods are shipped directly from the vendor's premises (located outside India) to the customer's premises.

Detailed Analysis:

1. GST on Goods Procured from Vendor Located Outside India:
The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) determined that GST is not payable on goods procured from a vendor located outside India if the goods are not brought into India. This conclusion was based on the definition of "import of goods" under Section 2(10) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act, 2017), and other related provisions. The GAAR ruled that since the goods do not enter Indian territory, the transaction does not qualify as an import, and hence GST is not applicable.

2. GST on Goods Sold to Customer Located Outside India:
The GAAR ruled that applicable GST is payable on goods sold to a customer located outside India when the goods are shipped directly from the vendor's premises (located outside India) to the customer's premises. The GAAR reasoned that the transaction qualifies as a "supply" under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act, 2017), and is treated as an inter-state supply under Section 7(5) of the IGST Act, 2017. The place of supply is outside India, but the supplier is located in India, making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST unless exempted or zero-rated.

Appellant's Contentions:
1. Delay in Ruling: The appellant argued that the ruling was pronounced after the mandated 90-day period, rendering it unsustainable and void.
2. Territorial Jurisdiction: The appellant contended that the IGST Act, 2017, extends only within India's territorial jurisdiction. They argued that the levy of GST on merchant trade transactions, where the supply occurs outside India's jurisdiction, is ultra vires.
3. Article 269A of the Constitution: The appellant argued that Section 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017, is ultra vires as it defines a specific transaction as inter-state without adequate constitutional power.
4. Definition of Export: The appellant argued for a broader interpretation of "export of goods" to include goods delivered outside India, even if not taken from India, aligning with the principle of a consumption-based tax.
5. Circulars and Precedents: The appellant cited CBIC Circulars and previous Advance Rulings to support their claim that GST should not be applicable.

Appellate Authority's Findings:
1. Timeliness of Appeal: The appeal was filed within the extended time limit prescribed by Notification No. 35/2020-Central Tax.
2. Levy of IGST: The authority upheld that IGST is levied on inter-state supplies of goods or services, as per Section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017.
3. Place of Supply: The place of supply, as per Section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017, is outside India since the movement of goods terminates at the buyer's premises outside India.
4. Supplier's Location: The supplier is located in India, making the transaction an inter-state supply under Section 7(5)(a) of the IGST Act, 2017.
5. Amendment in Schedule III: With effect from 01.02.2019, Paragraph 7 of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, excludes transactions where goods are supplied from a place in the non-taxable territory to another place in the non-taxable territory without entering India from the scope of GST.
6. Retrospective Effect: The amendment does not have retrospective effect. Therefore, IGST was payable from 01.07.2017 to 31.01.2019 but is not payable from 01.02.2019 onwards for such transactions.
7. Constitutional Validity: The authority cannot examine the vires of the law, being a creature of statute.
8. Definition of Export: The statutory definition of "export of goods" under Section 2(5) of the IGST Act, 2017, is clear and cannot be interpreted to include goods not taken out of India.
9. Circulars and Precedents: The cited Circulars and Advance Rulings do not apply to the present issue, and the provisions of the IGST Act, 2017, prevail.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority modified the Advance Ruling to state that IGST was payable from 01.07.2017 to 31.01.2019 on supply of goods directly from the vendor's premises located outside India to the customer's premises located outside India without entering India. From 01.02.2019 onwards, such transactions are not subject to GST.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates