Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (10) TMI 1116 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
Classification of toys with electronic components under GST: Whether they should be classified as "Electronic Toys" attracting 18% GST or "Other than Electronic Toys" attracting 12% GST.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicant's Submission:
The applicant, a regular importer and trader of toys, sought an advance ruling on whether toys primarily operated by physical force but equipped with electronic parts for light, music, and horn should be classified as "Electronic Toys" or "Other than Electronic Toys." They argued that these toys are manually operated and remain functional without the electronic components, which are ancillary and meant for enhancing entertainment.

2. Product Descriptions:
- Children’s Scooter SC-007: Manually operated with lights and music powered by batteries.
- Activity Ride-on: Manually pushed, with electronic lights and music.
- Smart Tri-Cycle: Pedaled manually, with lights, horn, and music powered by batteries.
- Kick Scooter: Manually driven, with lights powered by movement-induced electricity.

3. Applicant's Interpretation of Law:
The applicant referenced Chapter Heading 95.03, which classifies toys and their applicable GST rates: 12% for non-electronic toys and 18% for electronic toys. They argued that the toys in question should be classified under the 12% rate as their primary function is manual, and the electronic components are secondary.

4. Jurisdictional Officer's Remarks:
The officer classified the toys as "Electronic toys" because the light and music are battery-operated, despite the primary action being manual.

5. Physical Verification:
The officer verified the toys and confirmed that they are manually operated, with batteries used only for lights and sounds, not for mobility.

6. Hearing and Further Submissions:
The applicant reiterated their position that the primary function of the toys is manual, and the electronic components are merely ancillary. They referenced the Maharashtra Tribunal's decision in Nandi Marketing vs. State of Maharashtra, which held that toys requiring physical strength are not electronic toys.

7. Examination and Findings:
The authority examined the facts, supporting documents, and verification reports. They noted that the toys are designed for amusement and help develop motor skills. The products fall under HSN 9503 and are intended for specific age groups. The manufacturing process involves assembling electronic parts with other components.

8. Classification Under GST:
The authority considered the Customs Tariff Act and GST rate notifications. They noted that the term "Electronic Toys" is not defined in the notification or tariff. They referenced legal definitions and standards, including GB 19865-2005, which prescribes safety standards for electric toys, including those using electricity for secondary functions.

9. Decision:
The authority concluded that the presence of electronic circuits for functionalities like flashing lights, music, and horn makes the toys "Electronic Toys." They emphasized that both manual and electronic functions are integral to the toys' design and purpose.

Ruling:
The toys in question—Children’s Scooter SC-007, Activity Ride-on, Smart Tri-Cycle, and Kick Scooter—are classified as "Electronic Toys." The applicable GST rate is 18% (CGST @ 9% and SGST @ 9%) as per Sl.No. 440 of Schedule-III of the relevant notifications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates