1984 (10) TMI 44 - SC - Central Excise

Whether the Tribunal was not right in holding that hospitals and nursing homes were not industries? Held that - Industry ordinarily means the process of manufacture or production. The new definition given to the word industry by Parliament in the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982 (46 of 1982) specifically excludes hospitals or dispensaries from the category of industry . It shows that the meaning given to the expression industry, in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be depended upon while construing other statutes or statutory instruments and it should be confined to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. We are of the view that in the notification dated July 15, 1977 under which the exemption is claimed by the petitioner, the word industry means only the place where the process of manufacture or production of goods is carried on and it cannot in any event include hospitals, dispensaries or nursing homes . The Tribunal does not call for any interference.

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of the term 'industry' in a customs duty exemption notification.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Facts and Background:
The appellant imported stainless steel plates under a concessional rate of duty, subject to certain conditions, including selling the manufactured articles to industrial units. The Assistant Collector demanded full duty as end-use certificates were not filed. Discrepancies were found in the appellant's compliance with the conditions, leading to the dispute.

2. Interpretation of 'Industry' in Customs Duty Exemption:
The primary issue revolved around whether hospitals and nursing homes qualified as 'industrial units' under the customs duty exemption notification. The appellant argued hospitals fell within the definition of 'industry' based on a decision under the Industrial Disputes Act, which has a broad definition. However, the court clarified that the definition of 'industry' in a specific statute cannot be applied universally, especially in a different context like customs duty exemptions.

3. Legal Interpretation and Precedents:
The court emphasized that the term 'industry' should be construed in its commercial sense in a taxing statute. It highlighted that definitions in one statute should not be blindly applied to another without considering the context. The court referred to constitutional provisions and past judgments to establish that 'industry' in the customs context referred to manufacturing or production processes, excluding entities like hospitals or nursing homes.

4. Decision and Conclusion:
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, rejecting the appellant's argument regarding hospitals and nursing homes being classified as industrial units. It concluded that the customary understanding of 'industry' in the customs context did not encompass establishments like hospitals. The appeal was dismissed based on this interpretation, affirming the Tribunal's ruling.

In summary, the judgment delves into the nuanced interpretation of the term 'industry' within the context of customs duty exemptions, clarifying that the definition varies across statutes and must align with the specific legislative intent. The court's analysis underscores the importance of contextual interpretation and application of legal terms within the relevant statutory framework.