Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (11) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (11) TMI 391 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Admissibility of the application under Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Exemption under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 for services provided by way of producing documentary videos and pictures of testimony to government entities.
3. Interpretation of whether services provided to various government departments, local authorities, and boards are exempted under GST.

Issue 1: Admissibility of the application under Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017:
The application filed for Advance Ruling by the individual engaged in providing documentary services was deemed admissible as it pertained to the determination of the liability to pay tax on goods or services under Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Issue 2: Exemption under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017:
The applicant sought exemption under entry No.3 of the Notification, which provides for exemption on pure services provided to government entities in relation to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities under the Constitution. The Authority analyzed the conditions for exemption under this entry, emphasizing the need to satisfy criteria related to the nature of services provided and the entities receiving the services. It was concluded that the services provided did not meet the specified conditions for exemption, making them liable to tax at 18% (9% CGST and 9% KGST).

Issue 3: Interpretation of exemption for services provided to government entities:
The Authority examined whether the services of producing documentary videos and pictures of testimony for various government departments, local authorities, and boards qualified for exemption under the relevant Notification. It was determined that since the services were not provided in relation to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities as specified in the Constitution, they were subject to tax at the prescribed rates.

In summary, the Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka, ruled that the documentary services, including pictures of testimony and videos provided to government entities, were not exempted under GST and were taxable at 9% under both the CGST Act and the SGST Act. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the provisions of the relevant Notification and the nature of services provided by the applicant to various government departments, local authorities, and boards.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates