Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (3) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (3) TMI 846 - HC - Income TaxStay of demand - recovery proceedings initiated during pendency of appeal - HELD THAT - As far as the latter is concerned, there is no opportunity for the petitioner to upload the stay petition after the commencement of the National Faceless Appeal Scheme. In similar matters this Court had, taking note of the prejudice being caused to the assessees, have directed the National Faceless Appeal Centre to provide a link to the assessees to enable them to upload stay petitions in pending appeals. This Court is of the opinion that petitioner should also be given a similar relief. Accordingly there will be a direction to respondents 3 to 5 to provide a link, to the petitioner to upload an application for stay, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Once a link is provided to the petitioner, the stay application as sought for must be uploaded within two weeks thereafter. If such directions are complied with, the Competent Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose of the stay application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of uploading of the application for stay. Despite the uploading of stay application, the appellate authority will be at liberty to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal itself.
Issues:
Challenge to assessment order under Income Tax Act, 1961 - Opportunity for stay petition before appellate authority - Prejudice due to proposed recovery proceedings during pendency of appeal - Direction to provide link for uploading stay petition - Timely disposal of stay application by Competent Appellate Authority. Analysis: The petitioner challenged an assessment order denying exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-2019. The appeal was filed before the National Faceless Appeal Centre without seeking a stay as there was no threat of recovery proceedings at that time. The grievance raised was the proposed initiation of recovery proceedings during the appeal, causing prejudice unless the appellate authority either expeditiously completes proceedings or allows for a stay petition. The Court noted the lack of opportunity to upload stay petitions post the National Faceless Appeal Scheme's commencement. In response to similar cases causing prejudice to assessees, the Court directed the respondents to provide a link for the petitioner to upload a stay application within four weeks of the judgment's receipt. The petitioner must upload the stay application within two weeks after receiving the link. The Competent Appellate Authority was instructed to consider and dispose of the stay application promptly, within six weeks of the application's upload. Despite the stay application, the appellate authority retains the discretion to decide on the appeal itself. Coercive proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be stayed until the directed stay application process is completed. The Court emphasized the importance of timely resolution of the stay application while allowing the appellate authority to continue with the appeal proceedings parallelly. The judgment concluded by disposing of the writ petition, setting out clear directives for the provision of a link for stay application upload and ensuring the Competent Appellate Authority's prompt consideration of the stay application to prevent prejudice to the petitioner.
|