Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (6) TMI 81 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Disallowance of employees' contribution towards ESI/PF due to delayed payment.
3. Applicability of amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B by the Finance Act, 2021.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal filed by the assessee was delayed by 222 days. The assessee requested condonation of the delay, attributing it to the Covid-19 pandemic and associated restrictions, which hindered office operations and access to necessary portals. An affidavit was furnished by the Managing Director of the assessee company to support the request. Considering the reasons and in the interest of natural justice, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was decided on merits.

2. Disallowance of Employees' Contribution towards ESI/PF Due to Delayed Payment:
The assessee filed its return of income declaring NIL income, but the AO made an addition of Rs. 5,33,816/- for delayed payment of PF and ESI. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance under Section 143(3) based on the assessee’s failure to pay the contributions within the prescribed due dates as per Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

During the hearing, the assessee argued that the contributions, although delayed, were made before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1). The assessee cited various judicial precedents, including decisions from the Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal and the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, which held that such contributions, if made before the due date of filing the return, should not be disallowed.

The Revenue, however, contended that the contributions were not made within the prescribed due dates and relied on the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, which clarified that such contributions would not be allowed as deductions if not deposited on time.

3. Applicability of Amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B by the Finance Act, 2021:
The Tribunal noted that the amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B by the Finance Act, 2021, are applicable from 1st April 2021 and thus apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent years. Since the impugned assessment year was 2019-20, the amended provisions could not be applied retrospectively.

The Tribunal referred to the consistent decisions of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, which held that contributions made before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) should not be disallowed, even if they were paid after the due dates under the respective statutes. The Tribunal emphasized that the jurisdictional High Court's decisions are binding and should be followed.

Conclusion:
In light of the above discussions and consistent judicial precedents, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 5,33,816/- made by the AO for delayed deposit of employees' contributions towards ESI and PF, as these were paid before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1). The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

Order Pronounced:
The order was pronounced in the open Court on 31/05/2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates