Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 1989 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1989 (7) TMI 112 - HC - Customs

Issues: Determination of the point of time when customs duty becomes leviable for imported goods.

Analysis:
1. The case involved two writ petitions filed by separate petitioners seeking to quash customs duty assessment orders for imported goods. The petitioners imported viscose staple fibre blended yarn from the United Kingdom, and the dispute arose regarding the point of time when customs duty became chargeable.

2. The petitioners argued that the relevant date for chargeability was the date of the ship's entry into territorial waters, i.e., 7-12-1978, when exemption notifications were in force. On the other hand, the respondents contended that duty was chargeable on the date of berthing of the ship, i.e., 4-1-1979, when no exemptions were applicable.

3. The High Court referred to previous judgments, including the Bombay High Court's decision in Shahwney v. Sylvania and Laxman, to determine the point of chargeability for import duty. The court held that duty becomes leviable at the time of unloading the goods, not when the goods enter territorial waters, to ensure taxation of goods that become part of the Indian market.

4. Considering the lack of information on the actual date of unloading in this case, the High Court directed that:
- The date of actual unloading is the relevant point for chargeability.
- If unloading occurred on 4-1-1979, duty assessed under the Customs Tariff Act without exemptions would stand.
- If unloading was on 5-1-1979 or later, the duty should be reassessed based on the applicable exemption notifications (Nos. 6, 7, and 8).

5. The court's decision clarified the timing for customs duty chargeability, emphasizing the importance of the unloading date for assessing duties on imported goods. The judgment provided clear directions for reassessment based on the actual unloading date, ensuring compliance with relevant exemption notifications.

6. Ultimately, the High Court's ruling in this case resolved the dispute regarding the chargeability of customs duty for the imported goods, highlighting the significance of the unloading date in determining the applicable duty rates and exemptions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates