Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 516 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Application for dispensing with putting seal on Vakalatnama.
2. Bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for an offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act.

Analysis:
1. Issue 1 - Application for dispensing with putting seal on Vakalatnama:
The court allowed the application (IA No.13004/2022) for dispensing with putting a seal on the Vakalatnama, as it was duly signed by the non-applicants but the seal was not affixed due to a normal error.

2. Issue 2 - Bail application under Section 439 for an offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act:
a. Prosecution's Case:
The applicant was in custody for an offence related to smuggling 3 gold bars valued at Rs.1,58,20,500. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co-accused individuals, was involved in smuggling foreign gold bars. The investigating authority intercepted a vehicle where the gold bars were found in a specially built cavity. The prosecution presented evidence linking the applicant to the offence through statements, call detail records, and the manner in which the gold was acquired.
b. Defence's Case:
The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was falsely implicated. He argued that the offence was civil in nature, he cooperated with the investigation, and there was no legal evidence connecting him to the crime. The defence highlighted the applicant's health issues and business activities to support the bail application.
c. Court's Decision:
The court considered the gravity of the offence, the value of the seized gold, and the potential threat to national financial interests posed by economic offences. Referring to legal precedents, the court emphasized the seriousness of economic offences and the need for a different approach to bail in such cases. Given the evidence presented by the prosecution, the court concluded that releasing the applicant on bail could hamper the investigation and lead to evidence tampering. Therefore, the bail application was dismissed at that stage, citing the need to protect fiscal and commercial interests.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the bail application, considering the seriousness of the offence, the evidence presented, and the potential impact on the ongoing investigation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates