Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (12) TMI 1289 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of activities under Entry 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
2. Applicability of concessional rate of GST of 12% for the said activities.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Activities:
The applicant, engaged in the supply of works contracts to the Indian Railways, sought to determine if their activities qualify as composite supply of works contract under Entry 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The activities include welding, painting of welds and rails in construction lines, and maintenance activities such as weld and rail renewal in open lines.

The applicant argued that their activities qualify as works contracts involving immovable property, as per Section 2(119) of the CGST Act. They supported their claim by explaining the nature of rail tracks as immovable property, citing various judicial precedents that define immovable property and works contracts.

2. Applicability of Concessional Rate of GST:
The applicant contended that their activities should be taxed at the concessional rate of 12% under Entry 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. They argued that their activities involve construction, erection, commissioning, or installation of original works pertaining to railways.

Discussion and Findings:
The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) examined the submissions and found that the applicant's activities do not qualify as works contracts involving immovable property. The AAR referred to various judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in the case of M/s Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. and others, to conclude that the rail tracks do not qualify as immovable property. The AAR noted that the rail tracks can be dismantled and replaced, which indicates that they are not permanently attached to the earth.

The AAR also observed that the applicant's activities do not fall under the definition of "original works" as per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The activities were considered as completion and finishing services rather than new construction or erection of original works.

Conclusion:
The AAR ruled that the applicant's activities do not qualify for the concessional rate of 12% GST under Entry 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Furthermore, the entry 3(v) was omitted from the notification with effect from 18.07.2022, making the question moot for periods after this date. The applicable GST rate for the applicant's services was determined to be 18%.

Order:
The AAR concluded that the activities undertaken by the applicant for the Indian Railways are not classified under Entry 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, and the benefit of the concessional rate of 12% GST cannot be availed. The ruling is valid within the jurisdiction of the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh, subject to provisions under Section 103(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates