Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2023 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (8) TMI 845 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Assessment Order for the tax period 2008-09 to 2012-13 is barred by limitation.
2. Whether the principles of natural justice were violated in passing the Assessment Order.
3. Maintainability of the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy.

Summary:

1. Limitation Issue:
The petitioner argued that the Assessment Order dated 11.01.2019 for the tax period 2008-09 to 2012-13 is barred by limitation under Section 21 of the AP VAT Act, 2005. The court agreed, stating that the assessment should have been completed within four years from the end of each assessment period. The assessment for these years was indeed completed beyond this period, making it barred by limitation. The court cited the case of Triveni Poly Plast Pvt Ltd. v. The Commercial Tax Officer to support this conclusion.

2. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:
The petitioner contended that the V&E department's inspection report, which formed the basis of the Assessment Order, was not furnished to her, depriving her of the opportunity to challenge it. The court found merit in this argument, noting that the 1st respondent did not provide the inspection report despite the petitioner's request. The court referenced Nallana Sambasiva Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, emphasizing the obligation to supply such material to ensure fair opportunity for objections. Consequently, the court held that the Assessment Order for the tax period 2013-14 was also liable to be set aside due to this violation.

3. Maintainability of Writ Petition:
The respondent argued that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The court, however, found no force in this argument, citing Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai, which allows exceptions to the general principle when there is a violation of natural justice or when the order is without jurisdiction. Given the violation of principles of natural justice and the limitation issue, the court entertained the writ petition.

Conclusion:
The court partly allowed the writ petition:
(a) The Assessment Order dated 11.01.2019 for the period 2008-09 to 2012-13 was set aside as it was barred by limitation.
(b) The Assessment Order for the tax period 2013-14 was set aside for violating principles of natural justice. The 1st respondent was directed to furnish the inspection reports to the petitioner, receive objections, and pass a fresh Assessment Order after a personal hearing. No costs were awarded.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates