9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (9) TMI 381 - AT - Income TaxDeduction u/s 80IA(4) - claim made for the first time - Choice of initial assessment year - as per AO assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing of energy-saving devices being briquettes which cannot be considered as infrastructure facilities - Also period of 10 years for claiming the benefit of deduction under section 80-IA(4) of the Act has already expired from the initial assessment year - assessee contended that it has started new infrastructure facilities by upgrading its business with new plants and machinery thus the assessee should be eligible for deduction u/s 80 IA(4) - whether the assessment year in dispute in which the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 80IA in the year under consideration is the 2nd assessment year - HELD THAT - It is the settled position of law that the conditions attached for claiming the deduction u/s 80-IA has to be verified by the revenue in the 1st year itself i.e. in the initial assessment year. The revenue is debarred from denying the benefit of the deduction to the assessee claimed by it under section 80-IA of the Act after the initial assessment year on account of examination of preconditions. In holding so we draw support and guidance from the judgement of Saurashtra Cement Chemical Industries Ltd. 1979 (2) TMI 21 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT We also draw support and guidance from the judgment of ACE Multi Axes System Ltd 2017 (12) TMI 372 - SUPREME COURT where it was observed the issue regarding allowances of deduction under section 80IB of Act to small scale industrial undertaking that certain precondition to allow tax holiday under impugned section can be only examined in the initial assessment year only. It is the choice of the assessee to select the initial assessment year and therefore the same cannot be questioned. Furthermore there is a possibility that the AO during the assessment proceedings might disallow the expenses which may turn the loss of the assessee into positive income then in that eventuality the assessee can claim the benefit of deduction under section 80 IA of the Act. Thus we are inclined to hold that the deduction u/s 80IA of the Act was first-time claimed by the assessee in the immediately preceding assessment year. Therefore the deduction u/s 80IA claimed by the assessee in the subsequent year cannot be questioned until and unless the deduction claimed by the assessee in the initial assessment year is disturbed. Thus we are inclined to set aside the order of the CIT-A and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed. Non-deduction of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO during the assessment proceedings based on the audit report found that the assessee has given an advance to the party namely Garima Communication towards the advertisement expenses without deducting the TDS - HELD THAT - Assessee has not claimed the deduction of 5 lakhs shown as an advance to the party namely Garima Communication. Thus in such a situation we are of the view that there is no question of making the disallowance by adding to the total income of the assessee. Accordingly we set aside the finding of the learned CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee are allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Denial of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on advertisement expenses. Summary: Issue 1: Denial of Deduction under Section 80IA(4) The assessee, a public limited company engaged in solid waste management, claimed a deduction of Rs. 44,68,606.00 under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this claim, stating that the assessee had been carrying out its business activities since the assessment year 1994-95, and the period of 10 years for claiming the benefit had expired. Additionally, the AO noted that the assessee was engaged in manufacturing briquettes, which do not qualify as infrastructure facilities under the Act. The assessee argued that it had upgraded its plants and machinery, making it eligible for the deduction starting from the financial year 2003-04 (Assessment Year 2004-05). The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. Upon appeal, the ITAT noted that the deduction under section 80IA was first claimed in the Assessment Year 2004-05 and allowed by the department. It was held that the conditions for claiming the deduction should be verified in the initial year, and if allowed, cannot be questioned in subsequent years without disturbing the initial year's allowance. The ITAT relied on precedents from the Gujarat High Court and Supreme Court, emphasizing the principle of consistency. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition and allowed the assessee's appeal on this ground. Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Non-Deduction of TDS The AO disallowed Rs. 5 lakhs towards advertisement expenses under section 40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of TDS. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance. The assessee contended that it had not claimed Rs. 5 lakhs as an expense, and hence, the question of disallowance did not arise. The ITAT agreed with the assessee, noting that since the amount was shown as an advance and not claimed as an expense, there was no basis for the disallowance. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal on this ground. Conclusion: The ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made under both grounds. The order was pronounced in open court on 05/09/2023.
|
