Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2023 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (12) TMI 7 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are whether the services provided to UNICEF are eligible for exemption under Notification No.16/2002-ST and Notification No.25/2012-ST, and whether the Appellant is liable to pay service tax for the disputed period.

Comprehensive details of the judgment for each issue involved:

1. Exemption under Notification No.16/2002-ST and Notification No.25/2012-ST:
The Appellant, engaged in various services, entered into Long Term Agreements with UNICEF. The department alleged that the Appellant is not eligible for exemption under entry no. 1 of Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services provided to UNICEF. The Appellant argued that UNICEF can be considered a "United Nations" or "Specified International Organisation" based on legal interpretations and agreements. The Tribunal noted that services provided to UNICEF are covered by exemption Notification No.16/2002-ST and Notification No.25/2012-ST. Citing judicial precedents, the Tribunal held that the Appellant is entitled to the exemption for services provided to UNICEF.

2. Liability for Service Tax:
The department issued a Subsequent Show Cause Notice proposing a service tax demand for the disputed period. The Appellant contended that services provided to UNICEF are exempted from service tax. The Learned Commissioner confirmed the demand, but the Appellant appealed to the Tribunal. The Tribunal, considering the legal interpretations and previous judgments, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the Appellant.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the services provided to UNICEF are eligible for exemption under the relevant notifications, and the Appellant is not liable to pay service tax for the disputed period.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates