Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2023 (9) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 1647 - AAR - GST


1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:

Issue 1: Whether the hostel accommodation provided by the Applicant is eligible for exemption under Entry 12 of Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, and the identical Notification under the TNGST Act, 2017, and Entry 13 of Exemption Notification No.09/2017-IT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended.

Issue 2: Whether the Applicant is required to register under the GST Acts if their aggregate turnover exceeds twenty lakh rupees in a financial year.

Issue 3: What is the applicable tariff heading and rate of tax for the supply of hostel accommodation services provided by the Applicant?

Issue 4: Whether the incidental activity of supplying in-house food to hostel inmates is exempt as part of a composite supply.

Issue 5: A question raised by the Applicant that does not fall under the scope of Section 97(2) of the GST Act, hence not addressed.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1:

  • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The core legal framework involves Entry 12 of Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) and its identical notifications under TNGST and IT Acts. The term "residential dwelling" is not defined under the CGST Act, but guidance from the erstwhile service tax law and various judicial interpretations were considered.
  • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court determined that the hostel accommodation provided by the Applicant does not qualify as a "residential dwelling for use as residence." The court emphasized the distinction between temporary accommodations like hostels and permanent residences. The court also noted that the Applicant's hostel is more akin to sociable accommodation rather than a residential dwelling.
  • Key Evidence and Findings: The Applicant's hostel provides various services, including housekeeping and food, with charges collected on a per-bed basis. Licenses and certificates obtained for running the hostel further supported its classification as a commercial establishment rather than a residential dwelling.
  • Application of Law to Facts: The court applied the exemption notification strictly, concluding that the hostel accommodation does not meet the criteria for exemption as it is neither a residential dwelling nor used as a residence.
  • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Applicant's reliance on the Karnataka High Court's decision in Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish was noted, but the court highlighted that this decision is under appeal in the Supreme Court. The court also dismissed other case laws cited by the Applicant as not applicable.
  • Conclusions: The court concluded that the hostel accommodation does not qualify for exemption under the relevant notifications.

Issue 2:

  • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 22 of the CGST Act, 2017, mandates registration for suppliers whose aggregate turnover exceeds twenty lakh rupees in a financial year.
  • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: Since the hostel accommodation service is not exempt, it constitutes a taxable supply, necessitating registration if the turnover threshold is exceeded.
  • Conclusions: The Applicant must register under the GST Acts if their turnover exceeds the specified threshold.

Issue 3:

  • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Notification No. 11/2017, Central Tax (Rate), and its amendments provide the applicable tariff heading and tax rate.
  • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court classified the hostel accommodation under tariff heading 9963, taxable at 9% CGST and 9% SGST.
  • Conclusions: The supply of hostel accommodation services falls under the specified tariff heading and tax rate.

Issue 4:

  • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 2(30) of the GST Act defines "Composite Supply," and Section 8 determines the tax rate for such supplies.
  • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court found that the supply of in-house food is part of a composite supply with hostel accommodation as the principal supply, taxable at 18%.
  • Conclusions: The composite supply, including in-house food, is taxable at the rate applicable to the principal supply of hostel accommodation.

Issue 5:

  • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court did not address this question as it falls outside the scope of Section 97(2) of the GST Act.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

  • Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: "Exemption notification should be interpreted strictly; the burden of proving applicability would be on the assessee to show that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption clause or exemption notification."
  • Core Principles Established: The distinction between residential dwellings and temporary accommodations like hostels is crucial for determining GST exemptions. Exemption notifications are to be interpreted strictly, and the burden of proof lies with the claimant.
  • Final Determinations on Each Issue:
    • Issue 1: Hostel accommodation is not exempt under the relevant notifications.
    • Issue 2: Registration under GST Acts is required if turnover exceeds twenty lakh rupees.
    • Issue 3: Hostel accommodation services are taxable at 9% CGST and 9% SGST.
    • Issue 4: Composite supply, including in-house food, is taxable at 18%.
    • Issue 5: No ruling issued.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates