The HC held that the assessment orders dated 30.08.2022 and ...

High Court Invalidates Assessment Orders for Exceeding Time Limit u/s 144C(13); Orders Issued After Deadline.

January 13, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The HC held that the assessment orders dated 30.08.2022 and 01.09.2022 were issued beyond the permissible limitation period. As per Section 144C(13), the AO must complete proceedings within one month from the end of the month in which the DRP directions u/s 144C(5) are received. The HC ruled that when the DRP uploaded its directions on the portal on 30.06.2022, it amounted to 'despatch' u/s 13(2) of the IT Act, and the AO's 'receipt' occurred on the same date when the electronic record entered the department's computer resource. Thus, the limitation period began from 30.06.2022, not 05.07.2022 when the email was received, rendering the impugned orders time-barred.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC held that the assessment orders dated 30.08.2022 and ...

High Court Invalidates Assessment Orders for Exceeding Time Limit u/s 144C(13); Orders Issued After Deadline.

January 13, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Assessment u/s 144C(13) - Time limit for completion of assessments and reassessments - Sub-section (13) to Section 144C, in my view, imposes a restriction on the...

Assessment u/s. 144C(13) - time limit for completion of the assessment order u/s. 144C(13) - The relaxation under TOLA would not be applicable to the assessment orders...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final assessment orders passed beyond the limit set by section 144C(13). It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO)...

The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except...

The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Despite the alleged violation of statutory procedure u/s 144B, the Tribunal found that the assessment...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with section 144B - the assessment order has been passed beyond the time limit prescribed u/s....

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144C(4) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

The ITAT Delhi held that the assessment u/s 144C(13) was time-barred, questioning the legality of the final assessment order. Referring to the case of GS Chatha Rice...

Powers of the DRP u/s 144C(8) - Tribunal was not right in holding that the DRP exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order. In any event, the order passed by the DRP...

Faceless assessment u/s 144B - time-limit to complete the assessment - Even if for a moment we hold that Relaxation Act is applicable to petitioner’s case, the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of time limit for issuance of Transfer Pricing (TP) Order u/s 92CA(3A). Referring to a case law, it was held that the TP...

Validity of assessment u/s. 144C(13) - Going by the mandate of sub-section (3) of section 144C(3)/144C(4), the AO was supposed to complete the assessment on the basis of...

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

Quick Updates: