2024 (7) TMI 1615 - SCH - Money Laundering

Money Laundering - HELD THAT - The case is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Tarsem Lal vs. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office 2024 (5) TMI 837 - SUPREME COURT . Hence the interim order dated 24th June 2024 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The Special Court may direct the appellant to furnish bonds for appearance in accordance with Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Section 91 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). Appeal allowed.

Summary

**Supreme Court Judgment Summary****Case Citation:** TMI**Judges:** Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih**Representation:**- **For the Petitioner:** Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR, and others.- **For the Respondent:** Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, and others.**Order:**1. **Leave Granted:** The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal.2. **Precedent Applied:** The case is governed by the precedent set in 'Tarsem Lal vs. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office', 2024 SCC Online SC 971. Consequently, the interim order dated 24th June 2024 is confirmed as absolute under the same terms and conditions.3. **Special Court Directive:** The Special Court may require the appellant to provide bonds for appearance as per Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (equivalent to Section 91 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita).4. **Appeal Outcome:** The appeal is allowed.5. **Pending Applications:** Any pending applications are disposed of.