Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2008 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (9) TMI 394 - HC - Central Excise
Issues Involved:
Appeal delay condonation; Completeness of Tribunal order; Confiscation and penalty imposition. 1. Appeal Delay Condonation: The judgment begins with the court allowing the condonation of a 153-day delay in re-filing an appeal, as stated in C.M. No. 15264 C.II of 2007. The delay was accepted for reasons presented in the application, and the case was disposed of accordingly. 2. Completeness of Tribunal Order: The appeal in question was brought by the Revenue, raising the issue of whether the Tribunal's order could be considered complete when it had not addressed all the grounds of appeal raised before it. The case involved the discovery of unaccounted M.S. bars, pipes, and tubes at the premises of the respondent, leading to confiscation, penalty imposition, and subsequent appeals. The Tribunal's decision vacated the seizure of pipes and tubes, set aside penalties on one party, and upheld penalties on the respondent. The court noted that the Tribunal had considered all contentions in the Original Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the Revenue's rectification applications and ultimately the appeal itself. 3. Confiscation and Penalty Imposition: The judgment detailed the confiscation of raw material and finished goods, imposition of penalties on the respondent and another concern, and the subsequent legal proceedings. The Tribunal's decision favored the respondent, ruling that certain provisions were not applicable to duty-paid goods and dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the other party. Rectification applications by the Revenue were rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs. In summary, the High Court judgment addressed issues related to appeal delay condonation, the completeness of the Tribunal's order, and the confiscation and penalty imposition in a case involving unaccounted goods. The decision highlighted the considerations made by the Tribunal, the rejection of rectification applications, and the final dismissal of the appeal.
|