Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + CGOVT Central Excise - 1993 (8) TMI CGOVT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1993 (8) TMI 86 - CGOVT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Interpretation of proviso (vii) of Notification No. 197/62 regarding rebate claim for exported goods.
2. Determination of the appropriate value for the purpose of rebate under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules.
3. Consideration of the definition of "value" in the context of exportation and duty paid goods.

Analysis:
The judgment deals with the interpretation of proviso (vii) of Notification No. 197/62 concerning a rebate claim for exported goods. The applicant's rebate claim for duty paid cut tobacco was rejected due to a discrepancy between the declared value in excise documents and the claimed rebate amount. The key issue was determining the correct value for the rebate claim under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules. The applicant argued that the value for exportation should include the duty element to prevent situations where high duty payments hinder rebate eligibility. The government analyzed the definition of "value" in different contexts within the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the distinction between assessable value and value at the time of export. The judgment clarified that the value at the time of export includes duty and should align with the value-cum-duty or FOB value. The government rejected a narrow interpretation of "value" and adopted the explanation under Rule 97A for determining the value for rebate claims, upholding the applicant's plea.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the importance of encouraging exports and ensuring equal benefits under complementary provisions like Rule 12 and 13. It emphasized that exporters claiming rebate under Rule 12 after duty payment should not be disadvantaged compared to exporters under Rule 13 clearing goods without duty payment. The government concluded that the term "value" in Notification No. 197/62 should align with the explanation in Rule 97A, ensuring fairness and consistency in processing rebate claims. Ultimately, the judgment ordered the applicant's claim to be processed and sanctioned based on the clarified understanding of "value" for rebate purposes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates