9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Classification of goods under Customs Act, 1962; Imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act; Examination of consignments; Justification for penalty imposition; Setting aside of impugned order.
In this case, the Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation of goods covered by Bill of Entry under Sections 111(b) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods, identified as scrap, were allowed redemption on payment of a fine due to their condition and intended use by the importer for melting scrap. Additionally, a personal penalty was imposed on the importer under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The Commissioner also directed the clearance of goods on payment of appropriate duty in cash and not through DEPP Scrip based on the enhanced value determined by the Group. The issue arose when the Commissioner classified the goods as Lady/Lace Brass Scrap instead of the importer's claim of Honey grade Brass Scrap. Despite the goods being crushed and disfigured, they were identifiable as crushed shells and not 'Misc. Yellow Brass', leading to their classification as Lady/Lace Brass Scrap and subsequent confiscation. The appellants argued that all scrap consignments were thoroughly examined under supervision, leaving no room for intentional importation of incorrect goods. They contended that the penalty imposed was unjustified as the scrap, though of a different grade, was suitable for re-melting/re-cycling, and there was no deliberate violation of import policies or the Customs Act. Upon review, the Tribunal found the impugned order to be erroneous as the goods could not be classified under Lady/Lace grade for valuation purposes without adequate reasoning. As a result, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of accurate classification and valuation of goods under the Customs Act.
|
