9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Valuation of imported goods solely based on internet prices without evidence of contemporaneous imports Analysis: The appeal in this case arose from an Order-in-Original (OIO) related to the valuation of imported goods. The appellants had imported CD Rom Drive, Floppy Disc Drive, and Scanner at declared prices. The department enhanced the value of the goods solely based on prices found on the internet. The appellant's counsel argued that the department failed to provide evidence of contemporaneous imports during the same period, and therefore, the transaction value should be accepted. The counsel relied on previous judgments to support this argument. The counsel contended that enhancing valuation based only on internet prices is not legally sustainable. The Tribunal considered the submissions and rejected the Departmental Representative's plea for remand to gather additional evidence. The Tribunal emphasized that adjudication must be within the scope of the Show Cause Notice and the allegations therein. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal held that in the absence of evidence of contemporaneous imports, the transaction value should be accepted. The Tribunal cited relevant Supreme Court judgments to support its decision to set aside the enhancement of value based on internet prices. Consequently, the impugned order was deemed not legal and proper, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any. In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the department's decision to enhance the valuation of imported goods based solely on internet prices without evidence of contemporaneous imports. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of relying on transaction value in the absence of such evidence, as supported by previous legal precedents.
|
