9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Disallowance of deposit forfeiture as business loss
Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad pertained to the assessment year 1976-77 and revolved around the disallowance of Rs.30,000, which was the forfeiture of a deposit paid against an order for purchasing machinery. The primary contention was whether this forfeiture could be claimed as a business loss. The assessee had initially paid Rs.30,000 as a deposit for machinery worth Rs.3,00,000 but later purchased similar machinery for Rs.1,90,550 from another party, leading to the forfeiture of the deposit. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed this forfeiture as a business loss, considering it a capital loss. However, the CIT (Appeals) accepted the assessee's argument that the forfeiture was incurred for business expediency and allowed the appeal. During the proceedings, the Departmental Representative argued that the amount was paid as an advance for purchasing capital assets, making any resulting loss a capital loss ineligible for deduction in the assessment. In response, the assessee's counsel cited legal precedents, including the case of Empire Jute Co. Ltd. vs. CIT and Mahabir Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. vs. CIT, to support the claim that expenditure for enduring commercial advantage can be treated as revenue expenditure. The Appellate Tribunal, after considering the arguments, agreed with the CIT (Appeals) that the forfeiture of the deposit was a business decision made for commercial gain. It was noted that the assessee benefited commercially by purchasing machinery at a lower cost while maintaining durability. The Tribunal emphasized the concept of business expediency and commercial interest, concluding that the forfeiture was a justifiable business expense. Therefore, the appeal of the revenue was dismissed, affirming the decision of the CIT (Appeals) to allow the deduction of Rs.30,000 as a business loss. In essence, the judgment underscores the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure, emphasizing the commercial rationale behind business decisions and the relevance of business expediency in determining allowable deductions for losses incurred in the course of conducting business operations.
|
