9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of freight charges paid to family members. 2. Disallowance of octroi charges. 3. Disallowance of commission paid. 4. Charging of interest under Section 215/217 of the Income Tax Act. Detailed Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Freight Charges Paid to Family Members: The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed Rs. 6,44,000, being 1/3rd of the total freight of Rs. 19,32,000 paid to family members. The ITO found that the total freight paid by the assessee during the year was Rs. 35,60,308, out of which Rs. 19,32,000 was paid to family members and Rs. 16,28,308 to outsiders. The ITO concluded that the fixed rate of Rs. 6,000 per month per truck was excessive, especially since an agreement stipulated a rate of Rs. 4,000 per month per truck. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, citing that the appellant had failed to provide comparative figures or justify the higher rate. The Tribunal, however, noted that the payments had varied in previous years and that the ITO had allowed a payment of Rs. 5,000 per month for a part of the earlier assessment year. The Tribunal concluded that a disallowance under Section 40A(2) was warranted but reduced it to 1/6th of the total expenditure of Rs. 19,32,000 instead of 1/3rd, directing the ITO to allow the necessary relief. 2. Disallowance of Octroi Charges: The ITO disallowed Rs. 2,56,496 in respect of octroi charges, stating that the octroi paid was more than the octroi received, and such payments were not business expenses but advances on behalf of customers. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance, emphasizing that the octroi payments were not the appellant's liability and should not be charged to the trading account. The Tribunal, however, accepted the assessee's claim, noting that the accounting system had been accepted by the Department for over 22 years and that any departure would require impractical adjustments. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow the deduction on account of octroi. 3. Disallowance of Commission Paid: The ITO disallowed Rs. 1,48,388 out of Rs. 2,22,582 paid as commission to M/s. Laxmi Trading Corporation (LTC), a partnership firm closely related to the partners of the assessee firm. The ITO found the commission excessive and unreasonable, invoking Section 40A(2). The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, rejecting the appellant's new claim that the entire transport business belonged to LTC and that the appellant was merely a collecting agent. The Tribunal, however, noted that LTC had been accepted as a genuine firm and that the commission payments had been allowed in previous years. The Tribunal found the commission rate of 16.34% reasonable and directed the ITO to allow the commission in full. 4. Charging of Interest Under Section 215/217: The issue of charging interest under Section 215/217 did not arise out of the orders of either the ITO or the CIT(A). The Tribunal declined to entertain this issue at this stage and rejected the same. Conclusion: The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal reducing the disallowance of freight charges and allowing the deductions for octroi charges and commission paid in full. The issue of charging interest under Section 215/217 was rejected.
|
