9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of excise duty refund as revenue receipt under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Taxability of Excise Duty Refund as Revenue Receipt: The central issue in this appeal is whether the refund amount of excise duty received by the assessee is taxable as a revenue receipt under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in the processing of dyeing and printing of art silk cloth, maintains accounts on a mercantile basis. A dispute arose with the Central Excise Department regarding the payment of excise duty, leading the assessee to file a writ petition in the Gujarat High Court. The High Court directed the Central Excise Department to refund the excess excise duty paid by the assessee. The Supreme Court, while hearing an appeal against the High Court's order, allowed the assessee to withdraw 75% of the refund amount against a bank guarantee. Consequently, the assessee received Rs. 11,04,765, which was credited to a separate "Excise Duty Refund Account." The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the refund amount was taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who stated that the excise duty collected by the assessee from its customers forms part of its business receipts. Therefore, any refund of excise duty is taxable under Section 41(1). The CIT(A) referenced several Supreme Court judgments, including: - Chowringhee Sales Bureau (P) Ltd. vs. CIT (1973) 87 ITR 542 (SC) - Sinclair Murray & Co. (P) Ltd. vs. CIT (1974) 97 ITR 615 (SC) These judgments established that excise duty collected by the assessee is part of its business receipts. The CIT(A) also noted that the assessee had not forwarded the refund amount to its customers, making it liable for taxation under Section 41(1). The assessee's counsel argued that the provisions of Section 41(1) should not apply as the assessee had never claimed any deduction for the payment of excise duty. Additionally, the counsel argued that the refund was received on an ad hoc basis and was subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court. The counsel cited: - Union of India vs. J.K. Synthetics Ltd. (1993) 199 ITR 14 (SC) - CIT vs. Bharat Iron & Steel Industries (1993) 199 ITR 67 (Guj) The Departmental Representative supported the AO's decision, arguing that the provisions of Section 43B, read with Section 41(1), clearly made the excise duty refund taxable. The case of Mysore Thermo Electric (P) Ltd. vs. CIT (1996) 221 ITR 504 (Kar) was cited to support this view. The Tribunal examined the nature of excise duty as an indirect tax, similar to sales tax, and referenced several Supreme Court judgments, including: - Mc Dowell & Co. Ltd. vs. CTO (1985) 154 ITR 148 (SC) The Tribunal concluded that the excise duty refund constituted a trading receipt and was taxable under Section 41(1), even if the excise duty was not claimed as an expenditure in the Profit & Loss account of earlier years. The Tribunal also referenced the Karnataka High Court's decision in Mysore Thermo Electric (P) Ltd. vs. CIT, which held that refunds of excise duty are taxable under Section 41(1). The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's reliance on the judgments in Union of India vs. J.K. Synthetics Ltd. and CIT vs. Bharat Iron & Steel Industries, stating that these cases did not apply to the facts of the current case. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the findings of the lower authorities, confirming that the excise duty refund of Rs. 11,04,765 was taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed.
|
