9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Rectification of assessment order under section 154. 2. Opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 3. Claim for carry forward of loss and depreciation. 4. Jurisdiction of the AO to rectify the order. 5. Principles of natural justice. 6. Scope of rectification application. Analysis: Issue 1: Rectification of assessment order under section 154 The assessee filed an application under section 154 pointing out two mistakes in the assessment order. The AO rectified the order under section 154 by correcting the date of filing the return of income. However, the AO did not allow the claim for carry forward of loss and depreciation as the assessment was originally framed under section 144. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the application under section 154 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Issue 2: Opportunity of being heard to the assessee The Tribunal observed that the orders passed by the AO and CIT(A) were non-speaking and lacked details. The AO had not afforded the assessee an opportunity of being heard before passing the original order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice and directed the AO to reconsider the issue after giving the assessee a proper hearing. Issue 3: Claim for carry forward of loss and depreciation The AO rejected the claim for carry forward of loss as the income for the year was determined at nil under section 144. However, the AO allowed the carry forward of depreciation. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the revenue authorities and directed the AO to re-decide the issue of carry forward of loss for the assessment year 1986-87. Issue 4: Jurisdiction of the AO to rectify the order The Tribunal noted that the AO had incorrectly framed the original order under section 143(3) instead of section 144. The AO had also made errors in mentioning the date of filing the return. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO should rectify such mistakes promptly and consider the merits of the assessee's claims. Issue 5: Principles of natural justice The Tribunal highlighted the importance of following principles of natural justice in tax assessments. It criticized the non-speaking and sketchy orders passed by the revenue authorities and emphasized the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. Issue 6: Scope of rectification application The Tribunal clarified that the scope of a rectification application is limited but stressed that genuine grievances of the assessee should be considered. It directed the AO to re-examine the issue of carry forward of loss in the interest of justice and to ensure that the assessee's claim is decided on merit. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and directed the AO to re-decide the issue of carry forward of loss for the assessment year 1986-87 after affording the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard and considering the merits of the claim.
|
